CISO • GOVERNANCE
Compliance Framework Progress
Tracks how your program aligns to ISO 27001, IEC 62443, NIST CSF (and others) with measurable control progress and gaps.
What it shows
This view turns compliance into a living program: control completion, evidence readiness, and “needs attention” items by framework—all linked to immutable audit artifacts.
How it’s calculated
- Framework control mapping to QuantLayer telemetry, policies, and evidence artifacts.
- Progress computed from control status (implemented/partial/not started) and evidence freshness.
- Exceptions and compensating controls are tracked with owners and expiry dates.
What to do next
- 1Focus on red controlsthat intersect crown-jewel assets or regulated zones.
- 2Attach evidencedirectly from Immutable Audit Log (time-bounded and tamper-evident).
- 3Assign ownersand target dates; export progress for audits and customer due diligence.
- 4Use framework deltasto measure program improvement quarter-over-quarter.
KPIs to watch
ISO progress
%
IEC 62443 progress
%
Controls needing attention
count
Why this matters to a CISO
AI only works if it’s trustworthy
If models drift or confidence drops, you’re flying blind. This keeps the AI layer honest.
Drift is normal in OT
New firmware, new shifts, new processes—all cause drift. You need to detect it early before it erodes detection quality.
Confidence drives automation
You can’t let AI auto-contain based on shaky confidence. This metric ensures automation stays aligned with risk appetite.
Feedback loops improve accuracy
Every analyst decision sharpens the models. This closes the loop between human intelligence and machine learning.
Reference UI Screenshot
